Many years ago I read ‘The Sovereignty of God‘ by A. W Pink. This book is a well written work presenting the doctrine of the Sovereignty of God from the the Calvinistic perspective. It is well worth the read.
In this book the author affirmed the doctrine of ‘Once Saved Always Saved‘. Because of the sheer weight of Scriptures Pink presented, I believed the doctrine as very Scriptural.
A. W. Pink was from Nottingham and in my opinion, Pink was the most consistent Calvinist I have ever read. He was a brilliant man and an excellent Christian Theologian. He proclaimed the doctrines of Calvinism to the fullest with no weakness on his part. Obviously it is not difficult to realise that a man of such Scriptural knowledge would have his collisions with the Church of his day. His biography shows us examples of that. But most of it may relate to his Calvinism.
A. W. Pink should be admired, even by his Theological opponents, because he did not shy away from the proper logical conclusions to the clear teachings of Calvinism. These observations (in my opinion), separate him from the more common, inconsistent and unconvincing Calvinist revisionist preachers and writers of our day.
When I read Pink, it would not be long before I became persuaded by the doctrine of ‘Once Saved Always Saved’. Over time however, and through the clear lens of openly reading Scripture, the impact of Calvinism lost its flavour with me. I began to see too many Scriptures contradicting the system and Calvinistic apologists failing to explain the contrasts with proper exegesis or convincing argumentation.
In answer to my title, the reason I once believed in ‘OSAS’ was because of the selective Scriptures which Calvinists use to affirm their doctrine. I am convinced, if people simply read the Bible and never listened to Calvinistic preachers, they would see that eternal security is conditional and apostasy is possible for true believers. Christians have the duty to abide in Christ and no one can abide in Christ if they never were truly saved to begin with.
As a person who once believed the doctrine of ‘Once Saved Always Saved’, I understand it, not merely from knowledge, but from experience too. It is a very persuasive doctrine. However, over time I could see the natural progression of doctrinal bondage developing. Fear of departing from accepted doctrines and the teachings of popular preachers became easy to break when I digested and trusted the words of Christ “the Truth will set you free“.
The truth be told, people who believe in ‘Once Saved Always Saved’ very rarely arrive at that conclusion by simply reading Scripture alone, but by listening to their favourite preachers or their pastors, or biblically external books. For many people and preachers, the doctrine of ‘OSAS’ is Scripture itself and for an individual to deny it either makes a person a half Christian or simply not born again. These opinions however are absolute none sense. No one need accept such attitudes or permit themselves to be bullied into beliefs that contradict Scripture.
Obviously I would not regard those who teach the doctrine as false teachers, but I would say that without their rhetorical skills, the doctrine has little Scripture to authenticate it. The facts remain, as I have written in a previous article, the doctrine of ‘OSAS’ is a historical anomaly and was not taught in the church until the 16th century. John Calvin was probably the first person to have properly taught the doctrine. As I have previously argued in an earlier article, the doctrine likely has Gnostic origins rather than Scriptural foundations.
Over recent years I have repeatedly re-examined the doctrine and the more I read the New Testament from this perspective, and explored the contexts and the Greek, I saw an overwhelming amount of Scriptural evidences to claim the doctrine has little weight to it at all. In fact, there are so many Scriptures that contradict the position, many Calvinistic apologists and preachers are left scraping the barrel for argument, so much so that they are in danger of getting splinters under their finger nails.
The truth be told, there are over sixty or so verses in the New Testament which speak as warnings to Christians to remain loyal and in the faith and to abide in Christ.
It seems quite clear that the Calvinist claim that any believer who departs from the faith, was never truly saved in the first place, may well have some accurate Scriptural examples, but the majority of the doctrine is a violation of the plain reading of Scripture.
#1 by Nick on May 2, 2024 - 1:04 PM
Eternal security is not limited to Calvinism. I’m not sure where you got that idea. It is a biblical truth. God would have to take His promises back. He would have to take back His seal (the Holy Spirit) and Jesus’s words “it is finished” would not be for you. Nobody would make it if we did not have eternal security because we are constantly sinning. You would have to be undeclared as a Saved soul (as angels celebrate when 1 person gets saved,remember?) You would be under condemnation again whereas before you were declared not guilty (the Bible says there is no condemnation for those who is in Christ Jesus) The Biblical doctrine of eternal security must be true because if it weren’t then we would all be condemned in the end in that our ultimate salvation hinged on our ability to be faithful enough. That’s a lie. Salvation is by grace “through” faith. We do good works because we are saved and not to be saved. I’m not a Calvinist either. Peace
#2 by simon peter sutherland on May 2, 2024 - 7:41 PM
Thank you for your comment. I am very familiar with the arguments you have presented here. Although I would agree with some of the finer points you have mentioned, my position does not relate to the general Christian who believes in Jesus Christ.
My position relates to the doctrine of apostasy, not the eternal security of a believer. The promises of God concerning salvation are effectual only for those who believe and go on believing, not for those who don’t.
#3 by simon peter sutherland on May 3, 2024 - 12:53 PM
To further respond to your comment, your wrote; “Eternal security is not limited to Calvinism. I’m not sure where you got that idea.”
To clarify, I have at no time “limited” the doctrine of “Eternal security” to “Calvinism”.
In a previous article I have stated the doctrine of “OSAS” is a “historic anomaly” and cannot be traced before John Calvin.