“Therefore, from the birth of Christ to the death of Commodus are a total of one hundred ninety-four years, one month, and thirteen days. There are those who have calculated not only the year of our Lord’s birth, but also the day. They say that it took place in the twenty-eighth year of Augustus, on the twenty-fifth day of Pachon [May 20] … Others say that He was born on the twenty-fourth or twenty-fifth day of Pharmuthi [April 19 or 20]”
Clement of Alexandria (c. 195)
Following on from my previous post concerning the birth of Jesus and my expressive doubts that the Bible even remotely claims that Jesus was born on December 25th, I continue on with this polemical theme, and in this post, consider a historic claim made by Clement of Alexandria in the 2nd century AD.
For those readers who may never have heard or read anything of Clement of Alexandria, his life is worth looking into. With that in mind permit me to spend a few moments relaying some things concerning his life and work.
Clement of Alexandria was born c. 150 AD in Athens, Greece and is believed to have died in Jerusalem c. 215 or 220 AD. He was a Christian Theologian and is venerated as a ‘Church father’ and his writings provide us with important source material concerning the beliefs and claims of the ante-Nicene Church fathers.
He wrote on such varied ethical topics as eating, drinking, laughter, filthy speaking, clothes, true beauty, ear rings, hair, Government, and behaviour in public baths. He also wrote concerning human arts, the necessity of understanding the Scriptures and Greek Philosophy. Clement wrote concerning the Septuagint and the comparison between the ancient Greeks with the Hebrews. Indeed, much of our understanding of early Christianity and the views of early Christians comes directly from the writings of the early ante-Nicene Church fathers.
A number of Clement’s works have fully survived. Here is a list of three of them.
- The Protrepticus
- The Paedagogus
- The Stromata
On embracing Christianity, Clement travelled extensively over Greece, Italy, and Jerusalem seeking instructions and teaching from “the most eminent teachers” of his day. He was recommended by Alexander, the Bishop of Jerusalem and Origen was one of his pupils. Church historian Eusebius also speaks well of him. Clement taught that Jesus Christ was the personal saviour of men and the living Word of God and he affirmed the Inspiration of the Holy Scriptures.
As part of Clement’s research and historic record of his day, the claim he made that “Others say that He (Jesus) was born on the twenty-fourth or twenty-fifth day of Pharmuthi [April 19 or 20]” may well be the earliest known reference to the actual birth date of Jesus?
It is with all this in mind that when a historic Church father of this calibre made such a historic claim that Jesus was not believed in his day to have been born on December 25th or anywhere near that date but in either April or May, I feel I must point out; it really is irrelevant whether a modern person agrees with Clement or not. He wrote what he wrote regardless!
With this in mind it is certainly clear we need no emphasis on ‘historic revisionism’ since it may well be more historically consistent to claim Nisan as Jesus’ birth date rather than December and we can be certain that neither Matthew or Luke made any references to the birth of Jesus as taking place in winter. On the contrary, as I stated in my previous article, “it is more probable that He was born at Nisan which took place in the spring”. And it seems by all accounts that Ecclesiastical history may well affirm this too!
Nisan falls in March-April, and Clement claims Jesus’ birth date as either April 19th or 20th which is almost upon us. So, since this really is not a divisive issue, may I humbly suggest that believers and followers of Jesus Christ consider this history as we approach the coming months and the season of Nisan.
#1 by MithrandirOlorin on November 3, 2018 - 6:40 AM
Clement said what some “others” calculated, his own belief was counting back from the Death of Commodious on December 31st 192 AD. If he was using the Roman Calendar that placed Jesus Birth in November of 3 BC, but if he used the local Egyptian Calendar then on January 6th 2 BC agreeing with common Eastern Orthodox Tradition. These “others” may well have confused the time of year of Jesus Birth with His Conception.
Hipolystus of Rom Placed Jesus birth on December 25th. Numerous Ancient Sources place when Gabriel appeared to Zechariah in TIshri. Sorry but most Pre-Nicene evidence agrees with a Winter Nativity.
#2 by simon peter sutherland on November 4, 2018 - 9:42 PM
Hello, thank you for your comment.
In any historic claim or claims I make, I provide a source or sources to substantiate them. Could you please provide a source or sources for your claims.
#3 by MithrandirOlorin on November 4, 2018 - 11:00 PM
What I said is based on what you yourself quoted from Clement.
#4 by simon peter sutherland on November 5, 2018 - 9:24 PM
Hello. I asked for sources. you responded: “What I said is based on what you yourself quoted from Clement.”
Yet you wrote: “Hipolystus of Rom Placed Jesus birth on December 25th.”
and “Numerous Ancient Sources place when Gabriel appeared to Zechariah in TIshri.”
and “Sorry but most Pre-Nicene evidence agrees with a Winter Nativity.”
Am I missing something?