Was Jesus crucified on Good Friday?

I have been very reflective lately concerning the importance of Easter and I like many have been observing this important Christian festival.

I like Good Friday, and yesterday I was minded to post an article on the topic ‘Was Jesus crucified on a Friday?’ I wanted to present my thoughts concerning the historic perspective of the crucifixion day rather than the traditional day celebrated by the church.

For many believers and unbelievers it is automatically assumed that Jesus was crucified on a Friday and I don’t want to be insensitive to believers who might want to remember Good Friday as the day our Lord was crucified. I too hold Good Friday in regard. However I have decided to mention a few reasons why I believe it is more likely that Jesus was crucified in the middle of the week either on a Wednesday or a Thursday.

Here are my reasons;

  • Mark 15: 42 places the evening of the crucifixion at the beginning of preparation day, “the day before the Sabbath” (NKJV).
  • Luke 23; 54 places the burial of Jesus on preparation day with the Sabbath drawing near.
  • John 19: 42 also places the laying of Jesus in the tomb on preparation day.
  • Matthew 27: 62 places the gathering of the chief priests and the Pharisees on “the next day” after the crucifixion on “the Day of Preparation” (NKJV).

It is important to note that the event of the crucifixion and death of Jesus had already taken place at the point we meet these verses. This means a whole day had gone by where Jesus faced a series of trials leading to His crucifixion and death, and in the Jewish calendar the day begins at sunset, as stated in Genesis 1: 5 “the evening and the morning were the first day.“.

In contrast to our western minds when a new day begins at midnight, the new day in Biblical Israel began at sunset. This means the preparation day began on Thursday evening, meaning that Jesus had been crucified earlier on that day.

Likewise, in Matthew 12: 40 Jesus prophesies that “as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” (NKJV)

I have looked at many arguments concerning this and there seems to be no way around it; no matter how we look at it, Friday to Sunday does not give us three days and three nights. On the contrary, it would be more fitting to say this;

  • Thursday evening to Friday evening gives us one day and one night.
  • Friday evening to Saturday evening gives us one day and one night.
  • A Saturday evening to a Sunday morning gives us one night and a morning.

Thus multiplied together gives us a period of three days and three nights, leaving Jesus rising from the tomb on the third day being a Sunday morning. Luke 24: 1 places the first sighting of the resurrection of Christ on “the first day of the week, very early in the morning,”

If Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday, that would give us even more time, and perhaps too many days. However, if Jesus had been crucified on a Friday, that would only give us a Friday and Saturday evening being only two nights and would not answer the statements made that Jesus was laid in the tomb as the Preparation Day was approaching and just begun.

In order to believe that Jesus was crucified on a Friday one would have to interpret Matthew 12: 40 in a metaphorical or symbolic sense and not literal.

I hope these thoughts give you pause for reflection during this important festival when we remember what Christ has done for us.

, , ,

  1. #1 by sabertruthtiger57 on April 16, 2024 - 5:11 PM

    You are a good writer. I believe Friday is the correct day of the crucifixion. Matthew 12:40 is problematic but is probably a scribal emendation from a scribe who knew Jonah well and added the “three nights” into Jesus’s mouth. Luke refers to the sign of Jonah too but does not include the “three days and three nights.”

    If Matthew 12:40 is legit then the Bible contradicts itself because the Gospels declare in numerous places Jesus would rise on “the third day” and he died on Wednesday, then Friday would be the third day. If Jesus died on Thursday, then Saturday afternoon would be the third day. There are no eyewitness accounts for a Saturday resurrection. So, if Matthew 12:40 is correct then we have contradictions galore.

    In Jesus’s day there was an annual convocation that was held on Nisan 15 but it was not called a Sabbath at that time. The only Sabbath in Jesus’s day was the weekly Sabbath. Jesus died on a Friday, the day before the Sabbath (Mark 15:42) The day before the weekly Sabbath is pro sabbaton in the Greek and elsewhere in non-biblical Greek writings pro sabbation always means the day before the weekly Sabbath.

    Moreover, the Greek word paraskeue for Preparation often meant Friday in non-biblical Greek texts and so it is in the Gospels. Preparation of the Passover had two possibilities: It was the Friday of the Passover Feast or it was the preparation of the Passover week where no unleavened bread could be eaten. Homes had to be swept, furniture moved, and the whole house inspected before sunset Nisan 14.

    • #2 by simon peter sutherland on April 18, 2024 - 12:54 PM

      Thank you for your comment.

      Let us look at your statement; “Matthew 12:40 is problematic but is probably a scribal emendation from a scribe who knew Jonah well and added the “three nights” into Jesus’s mouth.”

      That doesn’t make sense. Matthew 12: 40 is not problematic and to imply the statement in Jonah is “probably a scribal emendation” is to dismiss what is written based upon speculation. To claim “a scribe who knew Jonah well and added the “three nights” into Jesus’s mouth.” is also a strange statement. Are you implying the scribe added that statement to Matthews text or Jonah or that Jesus didn’t say that statement in the first place or that Jesus got it wrong? What are you saying?

      You rightly claim the Scriptures affirm that “Jesus would rise on “the third day” and then you add “and he died on Wednesday, then Friday would be the third day. If Jesus died on Thursday, then Saturday afternoon would be the third day.”

      Your statement is incorrect. The Jewish day begins at sunset, as I have stated. If He died on the Thurs, and was placed in the tomb at the start of the new day, which would have been Thursday evening to us, there is no Thursday in the tomb but an evening, we are left with a Friday that begin at sunset. Thus Friday equals day 1, Saturday equals day 2 and Jesus rises again on the third day which is Sunday. Friday does not give us three days.

      Likewise, I clarify, the New Testament does not claim Jesus was crucified on Preparation day, as I have stated “Matthew 27: 62 places the gathering of the chief priests and the Pharisees on “the next day” after the crucifixion on “the Day of Preparation” (NKJV).”

      • #3 by sabertruthtiger57 on April 20, 2024 - 11:06 PM

        Simon Peter Southerland
        Let us look at your statement; “Matthew 12:40 is problematic but is probably a scribal emendation from a scribe who knew Jonah well and added the “three nights” into Jesus’s mouth.”

        That doesn’t make sense. Matthew 12: 40 is not problematic and to imply the statement in Jonah is “probably a scribal emendation” is to dismiss what is written based upon speculation. To claim “a scribe who knew Jonah well and added the “three nights” into Jesus’s mouth.” is also a strange statement. Are you implying the scribe added that statement to Matthews text or Jonah or that Jesus didn’t say that statement in the first place or that Jesus got it wrong? What are you saying?

        SABER TRUTH TIGER
        The statement “three days and three nights” doesn’t make sense in the context of the Gospels. In numerous passages the Gospels declare Jesus would rise on the dead “the third day”. If Jesus was in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights, he would have arisen on the fourth day and not the third. Jews counted days inclusively. So did most of the known world at that time. That means if Jesus died on a Wednesday afternoon, that would be the first day of his death. Friday daytime would be the third day of his death. That verse flatly contradicts over ten verses in the Gospels and one in I Corinthians 15. IF Jesus did indeed say “three days and three nights” then there are numerous contradictions created with every time the Bible declares Jesus rose from the dead “the third day”. On the other hand, if it is a scribal emendation, then there is no conflict with any of the verses that declare Jesus would rise on the third day.

        Simon Peter Southerland
        You rightly claim the Scriptures affirm that “Jesus would rise on “the third day” and then you add “and he died on Wednesday, then Friday would be the third day. If Jesus died on Thursday, then Saturday afternoon would be the third day.”

        Your statement is incorrect.

        SABER TRUTH TIGER
        No, it isn’t. The day Jesus died was the first day. The Jews did not wait until the day ended to start counting toward the third day. Jews counted days inclusively. The days began at sunset alright, but the Jews counted inclusively. That means the day event x happened would be day one and day three would be x, y, and z. The first day would be a partial day. The next day would be a whole 24-hour day and anytime during the third day would be the third day.

        Simon Peter Southerland
        The Jewish day begins at sunset, as I have stated. If He died on the Thurs, and was placed in the tomb at the start of the new day, which would have been Thursday evening to us, there is no Thursday in the tomb but an evening, we are left with a Friday that begin at sunset.

        SABER TRUTH TIGER
        Thursday afternoon would be the first day. I am sorry to see you repeat an error, but the Jews counted an event from the day it happened. If Jesus died on Thursday, Saturday would be the third day from which it happened. You simply dismiss Thursday afternoon so you don’t have to count it because to count it would expose the fallacy of your reasoning.

        Simon Peter Southerland
        Thus Friday equals day 1, Saturday equals day 2 and Jesus rises again on the third day which is Sunday. Friday does not give us three days.

        SABER TRUTH TIGER
        Friday would be day 2 if Jesus died on Thursday, day 1.

        Simon Peter Southerland
        Likewise, I clarify, the New Testament does not claim Jesus was crucified on Preparation day, as I have stated “Matthew 27: 62 places the gathering of the chief priests and the Pharisees on “the next day” after the crucifixion on “the Day of Preparation” (NKJV).”

        SABER TRUTH TIGER
        Yes it does. There was the Preparation, which was used in Greek literature of the period to refer to Friday, the day before the Sabbath. Not only was Preparation often used for Friday, but prosabbaton., found in Mark 15:42 was used in Greek literature of that time to refer to Friday, the day before the weekly Sabbath.

        Plus, Friday of crucifixion was NOT a Sabbath. Nisan 15 was not a Sabbath when Jesus walked the earth, except if it fell on a weekend Sabbath. The Nisan 15 Sabbath came later.

        Inclusive counting in the “Bible Days”: What is Inclusive Reckoning? (wednesdaycrucifixion.com)

  2. #4 by sabertruthtiger57 on April 21, 2024 - 12:10 AM

    For Simon Peter Southerland

    INCLUSIVE COUNTING PROOF

    Here are some proofs of inclusive counting from the internet.

    1. The clearest Biblical demonstration of inclusive counting is in the New Testament (see Acts 10:30 where a period of 72 hours is reckoned as “four days ago,” not “three”), but an Old Testament example is in 2 Kings 18:9-10.

    2. The battle of Samaria lasted from the fourth to the sixth year of Hezekiah, which is equated with the The siege seventh to the ninth year of Hoshea, and yet the city is said to have been taken “at the end of three years.” In modern usage we would say two years, by straight subtraction. Obviously the Bible writer reckoned inclusively (years four, five, and six totaling three years).

    3. A Hebrew boy was circumcised when “eight days old” (Genesis 17:12), that is, “in the eighth day” (Levites 12:3). Similarly Luke speaks of circumcision “on the eighth day” or “when eight days were accomplished” (Luke 1:59; 2:21). Evidently “when eight days were accomplished” (or “at the end of eight days,” RSV) does not mean eight full days from the date of birth, but eight inclusive.

    4. Jeroboam II of Israel succeeded his father Jehoash in the 15th year of Amaziah of Judah (2 Kings 14:23), and Amaziah “lived after the death of Jehoash … of Israel fifteen years” (2 Kings 14:17). A modern reader would mentally add 15 to 15, reaching Amaziah’s 30th year, yet Amaziah reigned only 29 years (verse 2). Inclusive reckoning is again the most logical explanation, since 15 years, inclusive, from the 15th year is the 29th, in which he evidently died.

    5. There are other examples. When, at the death of Solomon, Rehoboam was petitioned to lighten the tax burden, he told the people to depart “for three days” (1 Kings 12:5) and then return for his decision “after three days” (2 Chronicles 10:5). They came “the third day, as the king had appointed, saying, Come to me again the third day” (1 Kings 12:12; cf. 2 Chronicles 10:12).

    6. Jesus said in Luke 13:32 And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.

    7. Exodus 19:10-11 And the LORD said unto Moses, Go unto the people, and sanctify them to day and to morrow, and let them wash their clothes, 11 And be ready against the third day: for the third day the LORD will come down in the sight of all the people upon mount Sinai.

    8. Esther asked the Jews of Shushan to fast, and by implication, to pray, for her before she went in to the king unbidden, and then she approached the king “on the third day” (Esther 4:16; 5:1). Obviously a period of “three days” ended on the third day, not after the completion of the three days, as we would reckon it.

    9. The Pharisees did not call a high day “the Sabbath”. They called it “a Sabbath”. All days called “the Sabbath” in the New Testament (39 times in the Greek text) referred to the weekly Sabbath.

    10. An Egyptian inscription recording the death of a priestess on the 4th day of the 12th month relates that her successor arrived on the 15th, “when 12 days had elapsed.” Today, we would say that when 12 days had elapsed after the 4th, the date would be the 16th.

    11. The Greeks followed the same inclusive method. They called the Olympiad, or the four-year period between the Olympic Games, a pentaeteris (five-year period), and used other similar numerical terms

    12. The Romans also, in common usage, reckoned inclusively; they had nundinae (from nonus, ninth), or market days, every ninth day, inclusive, actually every eight days, as indicated on ancient calendars by the letters, A through H.

    13. Modern vestiges in the West are the phrase “eight days,” meaning a week in some European languages;

    I hope these help.

    14. Also, read John 4. In that chapter Jesus meets the Samaritan woman whom gives a drink of water. In verse 40 says Jesus abode in her village for two days (John 4:40) and yet in John 4:43 it claims that Jesus departed after two days. I can prove elsewhere that “after three days” which appears in Mark three times in reference to Jesus’s resurrection was equivalent to “the third day” in Matthew and Luke.

    15. John 20:26 says, “after eight days” the disciples were again gathered in the room when Jesus appeared amongst them. Scholars claim “after eight days” was an expression meaning a week later (i.e. Sunday to Sunday). Again, inclusive counting.

    16. It is important to note that Mark 8:31, 9:31, and 10:34 claim Jesus would rise “after three days”. Yet, when you compare the same accounts in Matthew and Luke in a good Harmony of the Gospels you will see “after three days” is interchangeable with “the third day”.

     17. Here is a definition of day from the Jewish Encyclopedia. jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/5007-day

    • #5 by simon peter sutherland on April 22, 2024 - 7:16 AM

      I see that you are passionate about what you believe and have a right to your opinion.

      However, since “Matthew 27: 62 places the gathering of the chief priests and the Pharisees on “the next day” after the crucifixion on “the Day of Preparation” (NKJV)” I cannot agree with you.

      I’m happy to agree to disagree.

      • #6 by sabertruthtiger57 on April 22, 2024 - 3:59 PM

        Thank You. Can you tell me why because the chief priests and the Pharisees met with Pilate on the day AFTER the Preparation that the Thursday crucifixion is correct?

      • #7 by simon peter sutherland on April 23, 2024 - 11:35 AM

        I understand that you can interpret Matthew 27: 62 the way you are reading it.

        There is a book I have studied which argues a similar case as you do called “Some New Testament Problems” by Arthur Wright (1898)

        There is a broad and diverse range of thought concerning this topic.

  1. The Resurrection of Christ did happen | Simon Peter Sutherland

Leave a comment